Tel : (408) 275-1798
Fax: (408) 871-8301
Personal Service for Positive Results
Real Estate Marketing, Sale, and Loan Consultant
Member of: National Association of Realtors, California Association of Realtors, Santa Clara County Association of Realtors, Grievance Commitee for Santa Clara Association of Realtors, and MLSListings Inc.
Home Net 123
Campbell, CA 95008
United States
ph: 408-275-1798
fax: 408-871-8301
home
C.A.R.’s Market Matters
State AGs, feds reach $25 billion mortgage settlement
Last Thursday, the nation’s five largest mortgage servicers agreed to a landmark $25 billion settlement with a coalition of state attorneys general and federal agencies. The settlement addresses past mortgage loan servicing, foreclosure abuses and fraud, provides substantial financial relief to borrowers harmed by bank fraud, and establishes significant new homeowner protections for the future.
The joint state-federal group announced the agreement with the nation's five largest servicers: Bank of America Corporation, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Company, Citigroup, Inc., and Ally Financial, Inc. (formerly GMAC). Collectively, the five banks service nearly 60 percent of the nation’s mortgages.
Under the agreement, the five servicers agree to:
Additionally,
California housing affordability improves in Q4
California’s housing affordability rose to its highest level in fourth-quarter 2011, matching a record high set in 2009, thanks to lower home prices and record-low interest rates, C.A.R. recently reported.
The percentage of home buyers who could afford to purchase a median-priced, existing single-family home in California rose to 55 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011, up from 52 percent in third-quarter 2011 and from 50 percent in the fourth quarter of 2010, according to C.A.R.’s Traditional Housing Affordability Index (HAI). The index was the highest since C.A.R. began tracking this statistic in 1988, and equaled a high set in first-quarter 2009.
Home buyers needed to earn a minimum annual income of $57,750 to qualify for the purchase of a $282,350 statewide median-priced, existing single-family home in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Investor purchases soar in January
Sales to third parties, typically investors, rose significantly in January, according to a report by ForeclosureRadar. California saw the most activity, with investors purchasing 3,964 properties for $766.2 million. This is the fourth largest month on record in California, and the busiest since March of 2011.
Despite what appears to be significant percentage increases in foreclosure starts in California, Nevada and Washington, these increases barely offset the declines seen over the holidays. Compared with January one year ago, foreclosure starts are significantly lower.
“January’s numbers should put to rest any notion that we will see a wave of foreclosures in 2012, at least in the western states that we cover,” stated Sean O’Toole, founder and CEO of ForeclosureRadar. “Foreclosure Starts remain near record low levels, significantly lower than a year ago, when many banks still had self-imposed moratoriums in place due to the robo-signing scandal. Add to that a foreclosure timeframe of more than 8 months, and there is little chance of a wave this year even if all the banks started the foreclosure process en masse tomorrow.”
In January, foreclosure starts in California rose 15.5 percent and foreclosure sales increased 14.6 percent.
More info
Home value index declines in fourth quarter
Zillow’s Home Value Index declined 1.1 percent in the fourth quarter, the company recently announced. For all of 2011, the Index declined 4.7 percent.
The newly released Zillow Home Value Forecast predicts home values will continue declining through December 2012, but with smaller declines in 2012 than 2011. While home values in some individual markets are likely to reach a bottom this year, Zillow does not forecast a definitive national bottom until 2013. The Forecast calls for a national decline of 3.7 percent in 2012.
Metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) like Los Angeles, Riverside, Calif., and Phoenix, which were among the hardest-hit in the housing downturn, will likely reach a bottom in home values and will experience home value increases or stability in 2012, according to the Forecast. Other markets that are likely to reach a bottom and see home values increase or remain flat in 2012 are the Baltimore and Washington D.C. MSAs. Markets which may end 2012 without significant increases in home values, but which are likely candidates to see a bottom late in the year are the Dallas, Denver, Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Fla., New York, Pittsburgh, San Diego, San Francisco and Tampa, Fla. MSAs.
More info
Mortgage loan delinquencies increase in fourth quarter
The national mortgage delinquency rate (the rate of borrowers 60 or more days past due) increased for only the second time since the end of 2009, edging upward to 6.01 percent at the end of the fourth quarter 2011, according to TransUnion.
Between the third and fourth quarters of 2011, all but 13 states experienced increases in their mortgage delinquency rates. On a more granular level, 64 percent of metropolitan areas saw increases in their mortgage delinquency rates in Q4 2011. This is the same percentage as found in Q3 2011, but up from Q2 2011 when only 21 percent of MSAs experienced an increase.
"There tends to be a natural seasonality, evident well before the recession, of higher delinquencies in the fourth quarter, perhaps explained by borrowers balancing holiday spending vs. debt payments,” said Tim Martin, group vice president of U.S. Housing in TransUnion's financial services business unit. “On the economic front, house prices continued to deteriorate in the fourth quarter and unemployment remained stubbornly high. This combination leads to more negative equity in homes and reduced real personal income that can affect borrowers' ability and willingness to pay their mortgages.
"The more encouraging news is that, when looking year over year, more homeowners are making their mortgage payments and the delinquency rate dropped more than 6 percent since Q4 2010. While it is certainly good to see the rate dropping, at this pace it will take a very long time for mortgage delinquencies to get back to normal."
Los Angeles Business Journal
California home prices down due to distressed properties
California home sales declined from both the prior month and year in January, according to data from the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.). The median price also was lower, primarily due to a sales increase in the distressed market.
Making sense of the story
In other news ...
CNNMoney
Home buying : Most affordable in decades
According to the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index, 75.9 percent of all new and existing homes sold during the fourth quarter 2011 could have been comfortably purchased by families earning the national median income of $64,200.
The Los Angeles Times
Mortgage reports shine rays of home for housing
A Mortgage Bankers Association report Thursday said that after seasonal adjustments, 7.58 percent of all residential mortgages were delinquent by at least one payment as of the fourth quarter of 2011. That was down from 7.99 percent in the third quarter of 2011 and 8.25 percent in the fourth quarter of 2010.
The Wall Street Journal
Housing agency’s reserves at risk
The Federal Housing Administration will exhaust its reserves over the coming year, according to budget projections released Monday, which would require a Treasury infusion for the first time in its 78-year history.
The San Diego Union Tribune
How to spot signs of a foreclosure scam
Renters in areas hit hard by foreclosures have been tartgeted with panic-inducing flyers stating they will be evicted. However, renters living in properties that have been freshly foreclosed upon have rights.
The Los Angeles Times
Consumer bureau to unveil monthly mortgage statement prototype
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau this week will unveil a prototype for a new monthly mortgage statement for consumers designed to clearly show important information from their servicer.
The New York Times
Loan terms made to order
Customized mortgages aren’t new, but industry experts say they are seeing more and more borrowers opt for fixed-rate loans with terms other than the standard 30 or 15 years, especially when it comes to refinancings.
The Los Angeles Times
Parts of Obama’s mortgage refinancing package will be reality
Though it was pronounced dead before arrival by opponents on Capitol Hill, President Obama’s new mortgage refinancing package contained far more than legislative proposals.
Talking Points
The Mercury News
More mortgage relief from the White House – but congressional ok doubtful
In his State of the Union Address, President Obama laid out a plan to help responsible borrowers and support a housing market recovery. Details of that plan were released yesterday. However, funding for the proposed program must be approved by Congress, lowering the possibility that it will be implemented quickly.
Making sense of the story
CNN Money
Mortgage crimes are focus of new task force
President Obama announced last week that he’s asked the Justice Department to create a special unit of prosecutors and state attorneys general to investigate abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis.
The Washington Post
Fannie and Freddie don’t deserve blame for bubble
There is plenty of blame to go around for the U.S. housing bubble, but not much of it belongs to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The Mercury News
Fight property tax bill with these tips
Declining house values create great opportunities for homeowners to contest their property tax bills and potentially save big money.
San Diego Union Tribune
Appraisers: Fed rule has hurt our pay, borrowers
The American Guild of Appraisers is digging into a federal rule it says has driven down the quality of home valuations, negatively affecting appraiser wages along with borrowers trying to get mortgages or refinances.
CNNMoney
Foreclosures made up 20 percent of home sales in 3Q
Sales of homes in foreclosure comprised 20% of all U.S. residential sales during the third quarter, according to RealtyTrac.
The New York Times
On troubleshooting
Those who have issues with their mortgage lenders now have another place to take them: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which began accepting such complaints and inquiries this month.
The Washington Post
Consumer confidence slips in January
The Conference Board said Tuesday that its Consumer Confidence Index is at 61.1, down from a revised 64.8 in December.
HousingWire
Treasury, FHA to let borrowers appeal mortgage servicer action
The Treasury Dept. and the Federal Housing Administration will issue new rules in the coming months allowing borrowers to appeal mortgage servicer decisions under certain modification programs.
Talking Points
Talking Points
The share of REO sales rose in December to 24.6 percent, up from Novembers 23.5 percent, but down from the 28.3 percent recorded in December 2010.
The Wall Street Journal
The new American home continues shrinking
The nations average home size, which peaked at 2,500 square feet in 2007, is expected to shrink to 2,152 square feet by 2015, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
CNNMoney
New home construction gathers momentum
The Census Bureau reported that housing starts fell to 657,000 on an annual basis, down 4.1 percent compared with November.
The Orange County Register
Calif. house price drop 7th biggest in U.S.
California house prices had the seventh-biggest price drop among U.S. states in November, falling 5.9 percent from year-ago levels, according to data firm CoreLogic
The Wall Street Journal
Places for home builders to dig in
Amid a flurry of housing news this week, including President Obamas latest mortgage-refinance proposal, comes an interesting piece of real-estate analysis in the building sector. Metrostudy has analyzed the strongest markets for home builders, which include: San Diego; Southern California; Texas Rio Grande Valley; St. George, Utah; and Orlando.
The Los Angeles Times
Consumer group tentatively supports $25-billion mortgage deal
The Center for Responsible Lending has called a proposed $25-billion settlement over faulty foreclosure practices between attorneys general, federal agencies, and the mortgage industry an important step in addressing foreclosure abuses.
The Wall Street Journal
Housing inventory ends year down 22 percent
There were fewer houses for sale at the end of 2011 than in any of the previous four years, a positive sign for the housing sector.
The Mercury News
Fed: Interest rates should stay low until late 2014
The Federal Reserve said its unlikely to raise its benchmark interest rate before late 2014, extending its time frame by at least a year and a half.
The Wall Street Journal
Sales stir hope for housing market
Existing-home sales increased 5 percent in December from a month earlier, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.61 million units, the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS said Friday.
The New York Times
A reprieve for unemployed borrowers
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recently extended their foreclosure forbearance programs to give short-term aid to unemployed homeowners, but housing counselors warn that these borrowers will need to look at longer-term solutions.
Making sense of the story
The Mercury News
Pay off mortgage early to save money
Paying off a mortgage might sound like an ambitious plan, especially for those who have recently refinanced into a 30-year term. But its still smart for homeowners to give some serious thought as to how theyll pay off their loan; if not in 2012, then sometime.
The Wall Street Journal
Amid squeeze on home equity, a revival for reverse mortgages
Converting home equity into cash has been a challenge for homeowners since the real-estate downturn, but a growing number of lenders are quietly reviving a loan for seniors that does just that: The reverse mortgage.
The New York Times
Shopping for the best rates
Interest rates are the lowest in decades, enticing many borrowers to shop for a loan. Mortgage lenders adjust their rates based on perceptions of risk, so unless the borrower can show theyre a low-risk individual, the borrower is unlikely to qualify for a rate that matches those seen in recent advertisements and headlines.
Making sense of the story
California house sales up, prices down
California home sales posted an increase both on a monthly and annual basis in November, marking the fifth consecutive month of year-to-year sales increases, according to figures released today from the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS (C.A.R.). Meanwhile, the statewide median price of an existing, single-family detached home sold in California rose 1 percent compared with October, but declined 5.2 percent compared with a year earlier.
Making sense of the story
Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California rose to a seasonally adjusted 503,570 units in November, up 2.1 percent from a revised 493,140 in October, according to information collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR associations and MLSs statewide.
November home sales also were up 2.3 percent from the revised 492,040 units sold during the like period a year ago. The statewide sales figure represents what would be the total number of homes sold during 2011 if sales maintained the November pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.
The November statewide median price of an existing, single-family detached home sold in California was $280,960, up 1 percent from $278,060 in October but down 5.2 percent from the $296,480 median price recorded for November 2010.
The Unsold Inventory Index for existing, single-family detached homes was 5 months in November, down from 5.3 months in October and down from a 6.2-month supply in November 2010. The index indicates the number of months needed to deplete the supply of homes on the market at the current sales rate.
San Francisco Chronicle
HARP 2 refinance plan a boost to borrowers, banks
The Obama administration announced broad outlines of the revised Home Affordable Refinance Program on Oct. 24. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issued guidance last week that filled in most of the details.
Making sense of the story
Foreclosure review under way
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Reserve Board announced Tuesday that the independent foreclosure reviews of 14 large servicers issued in April now are underway.
Approximately 4.5 million borrowers could have their loans reviewed and potentially be compensated for imposed financial hardship, according to a previous statement by the OCC.
According to the OCC, the review will take several months due to the volume of potential foreclosures to review.
The foreclosure review is part of a broader list of enforcement actions for the servicers to rectify missteps in the foreclosure process. The enforcement actions mandated by the OCC include improved borrower communications, greater oversight of third-party vendors, updated management information systems, and the elimination of dual tracking which takes place when a servicer forecloses while a borrower is being considered for a modification.
Borrowers wishing for review may visit IndependentForeclosureReview.com, or call 1-888-952-9105 Monday through Friday between 8 a.m. and 10 p.m. Requests for reviews will be accepted through the end of April.
Talking Points
Bloomberg
REALTORS expect 1 percent rise in Calif. home sales
The CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS (C.A.R.) released its 2012 Housing Market Forecast this week during CALIFORNIA REALTOR EXPO 2011 in San Jose. The forecast calls for California home sales and median price to improve only slightly in 2012, as the continuation of the tepid economic recovery, uncertainty about the future, and funding challenges for residential mortgages are expected to keep the market moving sideways, with little foreseeable momentum in either direction.
Making sense of the story
SmartMoney
The case for downsizing your home
Most boomers want to wait until the housing market improves before downsizing, but the savings of a smaller home may make long-term sense.
The Los Angeles Times
U.S. to have tough time in suits against 17 banks over mortgage bonds
Federal regulators allege 17 banks misled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the safety of mortgage bonds, but analysts say the two mortgage giants should have known that the loans behind the bonds were toxic.
San Diego Union-Tribune
How will Fed decision affect home loan rates?
The Federal Reserve on Wednesday announced it's changing its investment strategy, which could translate into lower mortgage rates down the road, market watchers say.
The Los Angeles Times
Sales of previously owned homes jump in August
The number of homes sold increased 7.7 percent in August compared with July and 18.6 percent from August 2010, the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS said this week.
HousingWire
Five more years of housing problems, with some stability in local markets
The housing market remains shaky and is unlikely to deliver significant growth in prices over the next five years, according to a new survey of economists, real estate professionals and analysts.
The Los Angeles Times
Mortgage rates hold steady, Freddie Mac survey says
The interest rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage held steady this week at a 60-year low while the 15-year fixed loan edged down to a new record low, mortgage finance company Freddie Mac said in its weekly rate snapshot.
The Mercury News
Community group urges residents to fight foreclosure
A coalition of community groups kicked off their "Refund and Rebuild California" campaign last week by releasing a report called "The Wall Street Wrecking Ball, What Foreclosures are Costing San Jose Neighborhoods. The report claims San Jose homeowners will have lost $22 billion in home values as a result of the more than 43,500 homes foreclosed here from 2008 through next year. As a result, the city of San Jose has lost an estimated $135 million in property tax revenue.
Short Sale Protection Expanded
by Anthony F. Ventura and Sarah E. Hammerstad
In January 2011, the California state Legislature passed a new law concerning short sales, which bans a first lien holder from pursuing the seller to recover the deficiency between the short sale price and the balance of the loan after the short sale is complete, if the bank agrees to the short sale in the first place.
In July, the Legislature, through the enactment of SB 458, expanded the protection of the above law to prohibit any lien holder from pursuing the seller after a short sale for any amount of money. That means second lender on a property cannot pursue a deficiency judgment against the seller, either.
The new laws also bar a lender from requesting additional compensation from the seller in exchange for the lender's written consent to the short sale. The new laws do not apply if the seller is a corporation, limited liability company, or limited partnership.
C.A.R. President Beth L. Peerce says, "SB 458 brings closure and certainty to the short sale process and ensures that once a lender has agreed to accept a short sale payment on a property, all lien holders - those in first position and in junior positions - will consider the outstanding balance as paid in full and the homeowner will not be held responsible for any additional payments on the property."
Anthony Ventura and Sarah Hammerstad are real estate attorneys with San Jose-based Miller Morton Caillat & Nevis, LLP. They can be reached at 408.292.1765 and aventura@millermorton.com or shammerstad@millermorton.com.
The Mercury News
Home buyers find themselves aced out by investors
In the Bay Area, about one-fifth of all homes sold in July were purchased by absentee buyers, mostly investors looking for rentals of properties to fix up and then sell, according to DataQuick.
The Wall Street Journal
Mistakes housing investors make
With traditional investments delivering low returns, some are considering buying rental housing. However, potential investors should do their homework and avoid the following common mistakes.
Making sense of the story
Talking Points
San Francisco Chronicle
Getting a fair appraisal in a tough market
Since the real estate market took a downturn, some people have complained they couldnt buy, sell, or refinance a home because an appraiser used bank-owned (REO) or short-sold homes as comparables in the valuation process, which dragged down the value of their home. While using REO and short-sold properties can lower the value of a home, some homeowners are upset that their county assessor will not use these properties as comps for their property taxes.
Making sense of the story
Talking Points
Talking Points
Talking Points
The sales prices of recently sold homes in the area are
lower than the list price of the home listed for sale.
Feedback from buyers agents suggests the home is
overpriced.
The home isnt receiving any showings, even though it is
well marketed.
There have been multiple offers, but they consistently have
been significantly lower than the list price.
Talking Points
Talking Points
Talking Points
Talking Points
Talking Points
As the new year gets underway, there are four housing issues consumers should keep a close eye on: Jobs, foreclosure delays, Washington, and lending standards and rates.
Jobs: If the job market improves, the demand for housing picks up, and many other challenges facing the housing market can more easily take care of themselves. However, if it doesnt, home prices will decline further, and more homeowners will fall underwater.
Foreclosure delays: In September 2010, some of the nations largest lenders suspended foreclosures due to potentially fraudulent document-handling procedures. Regulators and state prosecutors have launched a series of reviews, and investigations could shed more light on abuses, such as misapplied or excessive fees by servicers, their attorneys, or other third-party vendors. If foreclosures are more difficult and expensive to process, banks and investors could step up bulk sales of loans or foreclosure alternatives such as short sales.
Washington: This month, the Obama administration is set to issue an initial set of recommendations for how to remake Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the broader mortgage market. Meanwhile, regulators also are writing new rules on provisions outlined in the Dodd-Frank Act that will clarify how banks must retain some of the risk on loans that are bundled and sold off as securities and define what constitutes a qualified residential mortgage that is exempt from such rules.
Lending standards and rates: The government continues to dominate the mortgage-lending landscape, with more than nine in 10 new loans backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or government agencies such as the Federal Housing Administration. While some analysts have raised red flags over the FHAs finances and say that loans with 3.5 percent down payments are leading the agency to take on too much risk, others worry about tighter lending standards that could further pinch demand.
The New York Times
The price of a no-cost loan
Some home buyers who may be concerned about paying high closing costs might be tempted by a zero-cost or no-cost loan option, which requires no cash outlay, but typically adds a half percentage point to the rate. However, some financial consultants say these loans tend to be most beneficial to buyers planning to have the loan for less than five years.
MAKING SENSE OF THE STORY:
Talking Points
Many professionals charge a four-hour minimum, for example, or a service charge, to make minor tasks worth their time. Homeowners can save money on repairs and remodeling by saving up odd jobs, such as replacing a faucet or installing a ceiling fan, and hiring someone to do them all at once.
Bull vs. Bear: Will housingrebound?
Posted by Nin-Hai Tseng, writer-reporter
December 27, 2010 3:00 am
It's a question many Americans want answered: Will the value of my home rise or fall next year? Smart minds fall in both camps -- here are both sides of the coin on real estate.
One of the most closely watched sectors in 2011 will continue to be real estate a wildly emotional and divisive topic that's puzzled investors and economists since the housing bubble burst around 2007. Earlier this year, many observers thought the market would turn around in a big way as federal tax credits spurred home purchases and the economy added jobs following hundreds of billions of dollars of government stimulus spending.
As the end of the year approaches, the prospects of a real recovery look much dimmer. For one, it's become clear that we won't see a true rebound until we have job growth. With unemployment showing few signs of improvement so far, the bullish take on housing seems hard to swallow, especially when many experts say home prices still have room to fall before hitting bottom.
But a bullish take doesn't necessarily mean that prices would significantly rise. These are unprecedented times, and even the more cheery views fall short of predicting a steady surge in home values.
Here's a bullish and bearish look at real estate for 2011.
Bull: Buy real estate!
One of the most vocal bulls on housing for 2011 has been Bill Ackman, founder and CEO of hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management. At the Value Investing Congress in November, Ackman made a bold presentation called "How To Make A Fortune," highlighting why it's the right time to invest in real estate.
Ackman laid out several reasons but some key points include: With the fall in home prices and mortgage rates still relatively low, affordability is at its highest level in decades. What's more, while there's clearly still a glut in the supply of unoccupied homes, it will start to decline given that the rate of home construction is at historic lows.
Some of Ackman's points sound similar to the reasons billionaire investor Warren Buffett gave earlier this year for his prediction that the real estate slump would end by about 2011.
Of course, this doesn't mean he thinks home prices will return to their 2007 peak. In Buffett's annual letter to shareholders of his Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA), which owns real-estate brokerage and manufacturer
Clayton Homes
, he predicted that demand for homes would catch up with supply following a period where the glut of unsold property caused home construction to dramatically fall.
In 2009, housing starts (the supply side) were 554,000 by far the lowest number in the 50 years for which
Berkshire
could date. "Paradoxically, this is good news," Buffett wrote.
And with home prices falling, he said families who couldn't afford to buy a few years ago would finally be able to afford to do so. Buffett put it this way: "Prices will remain far below 'bubble' levels, of course, but for every seller (or lender) hurt by this there will be a buyer who benefits."
It's anyone's guess if Buffett's position on housing will change much in his letter to shareholders next year. It also remains to be seen if Ackman will continue to trump his "How to Make a Fortune" pitch with the recent rise in mortgage rates. For now, at least, both investors see promise in housing.
Bear: What bottom?
While home prices have for the most part stopped their freefall, some economists believe they haven't hit bottom yet.
Rick Sharga, a senior vice president at RealtyTrac, an online marketplace for foreclosure properties, recently told The Wall Street Journal that foreclosures for 2011 could top the estimated 1.2 million bank repossessions this year, which reflected an increase of 900,000 from 2009. This is partly due to the so-called "robosigning" mess that forced some lenders to stall a flurry of foreclosures.
While Sharga predicts that home prices nationally could still fall by about 5%, others say they could drop much more at about 10%.
Some might argue that further declines coupled with relatively low mortgage rates might just spur a flurry of home purchases, but Daryl Jones, an analysts at investment research firm Hedgeye says that's unlikely given that credit standards at virtually all major lenders are much higher and typically require larger down payments that would actually add to costs. Jones also thinks that home prices could fall another 15% to 30%, which means homes are actually still overpriced and might not attract more buyers as Ackman argues.
And while home construction is at all-time lows, Hedgeye says the trend is probably not as promising as Buffett and Ackman might think. The supply of housing is still very high the firm estimated in November that there's still 11 months of supply on the market to absorb, which is close to levels seen in 2009.
With so many variables working against the housing market, the bearish takes becomes all the more convincing. But one can always hope they're wrong.
Foreclosure rescue scams are going strong
According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), the two most common foreclosure scams are advance-fee loan modification schemes and sales-leaseback schemes, with advance-fee schemes.
In an advance-fee scheme, someone charges the homeowner a fee in advance to negotiate a deal with the mortgage lender. They may even offer a money-back guarantee, but the usual outcome is that they take the money (the average is about $3,000), provide little or no service, and then refuse to refund the fee.
In a sales-leaseback scheme, the scammer persuades the homeowner to transfer the deed to them by offering to assume payments and let the homeowner pay rent while the rescuer gets the houses affairs in order. The scammer generally promises to sell back the property to the homeowner once the homeowners financial situation improves, but they don't. Often they take out another loan on the home or even sell it out from under the homeowner.
Talking Points
Talking Points
CNNMoney.com
A service of CNN, Fortune & Money
By Les Christie, Staff writerSeptember 15, 2010: 5:43 AM ET
California housing prices on the rebound
The national housing market is shrouded in uncertainty. But in California, there are glimmers of stability.
Home prices are rising in virtually every corner of the state. They've climbed for nine consecutive months, and in July posted a 10.4% gain year-over-year. That puts the state's median price at $315,000 -- nearly twice the national median of $183,000.
And the news is even better in coastal cities. San Francisco posted the biggest gain of any U.S. metro over the past year, rising 14.3%. The median price there is now more than $607,000. Meanwhile, San Diego has climbed 11.2% (median price: $389,000) and Los Angeles jumped 9.2% (median price: $345,000).
Meanwhile, Florida, Arizona and Nevada -- California's erstwhile bubble-state partners -- continue to struggle. So where is the Golden State's strength coming from?
"I think it comes from the fact that prices went down so far and so quick," said Lesley Appleton-Young, California Association of Realtors' chief economist. "That left a lot of people here saying, 'Wow, affordable California housing.'"
However, a quick home price rebound was delayed by the crush of foreclosures that accompanied the subprime mortgage meltdown. California real estate had become so expensive that a basic single-family home required many buyers to overextend themselves with exotic loans.
That is no longer the case. Most of the subprime-related distressed properties have been flushed from the system. And when a foreclosure does hit the market, it's snapped up. The median days it took to sell a home in July was just 44 -- lightening fast.
"It's the dearth of supply for distressed properties that has put pressure on home prices," said Appleton-Young. "More than half the homes on the market last year drew multiple offers."
Plus, the California economy is picking up. Even in a recession, it has remained one of the world's 10 largest economies, mainly because it is driven by every major industry -- aerospace, tech, software, finance, agriculture, tourism. So as more of those industries recover and employment picks up, demand for housing will jump.
"California is a much larger, stronger and more diversified economy than the other [bubble] states," according to Stuart Gabriel, director of the Ziman Center for Real Estate at UCLA.
Another factor that has helped lift prices is a trend toward more short sales. Fewer of the distressed properties are going all the way through the foreclosure process. "The shift to short sales in itself would increase home prices," said Mark Goldman, who teaches real estate at San Diego State University. That's because short sellers usually occupy and take care of the homes until they're sold, leaving the properties in better condition and worth more than similar foreclosed homes.
Goldman added that California markets are, generally, more constrained than any of the other bubble states. Florida and Nevada, for example, still have room to develop and grow in most areas. But the lack of developable land is especially acute in California, pushing home prices up.
Finally, the California state government has not sat idle. "California provided markets with more significant price support," he said, "That played a role in elevating prices."
The state support came in the form of tax credits of up to $10,000 for first-time homebuyers and buyers of new homes. Some purchasers were able to combine the state credit with one from the federal government to reduce their costs by $18,000.
For home sellers in other states, what's happening in California is encouraging. Trends often begin on the coast, so they're hoping the recovery will roll eastward.
The Wall Street Journal Brett Arends, SEPTEMBER 16, 2010, 4:33 P.M. ET
10 Reasons To Buy a Home
Enough with the doom and gloom about homeownership. Brett Arends explains why owning a home is a good thing.
Sure, maybe there's more pain to come in the housing market. But when Time magazine starts running covers that declare "Owning a home may no longer make economic sense," it's time to say: Enough is enough. This is what "capitulation" looks like. Everyone has given up.
After all, at the peak of the bubble five years ago, Time had a different take. "Home Sweet Home," declared its cover then, as it celebrated the boom and asked: "Will your house make you rich?"
But it's not enough just to be contrarian. So here are 10 reasons why it's good to buy a home.
1. You can get a good deal. Especially if you play hardball. This is a buyer's market. Most of the other buyers have now vanished, as the tax credits on purchases have just expired. We're four to five years into the biggest housing bust in modern history. And prices have come down a long way about 30% from their peak, according to Standard & Poor's Case-Shiller Index, which tracks home prices in 20 big cities. Yes, it's mixed. New York is only down 20%. Arizona has halved. Will prices fall further? Sure, they could. You'll never catch the bottom. It doesn't really matter so much in the long haul.
Where is fair value? Fund manager Jeremy Grantham at GMO, who predicted the bust with remarkable accuracy, said two years ago that home prices needed to fall another 17% to reach fair value in relation to household incomes. Case-Shiller since then: Down 18%.
2. Mortgages are cheap. You can get a 30-year loan for around 4.3%. What's not to like? These are the lowest rates on record. As recently as two years ago they were about 6.3%. That drop slashes your monthly repayment by a fifth. If inflation picks up, you won't see these mortgage rates again in your lifetime. And if we get deflation, and rates fall further, you can refi.
3. You'll save on taxes. You can deduct the mortgage interest from your income taxes. You can deduct your real estate taxes. And you'll get a tax break on capital gainsif anywhen you sell. Sure, you'll need to do your math. You'll only get the income tax break if you itemize your deductions, and many people may be better off taking the standard deduction instead. The breaks are more valuable the more you earn, and the bigger your mortgage. But many people will find that these tax breaks mean owning costs them less, often a lot less, than renting.
4. It'll be yours. You can have the kitchen and bathrooms you want. You can move the walls, build an extensionzoning permittedor paint everything bright orange. Few landlords are so indulgent; for renters, these types of changes are often impossible. You'll feel better about your own place if you own it than if you rent. Many years ago, when I was working for a political campaign in England, I toured a working-class northern town. Mrs. Thatcher had just begun selling off public housing to the tenants. "You can tell the ones that have been bought," said my local guide. "They've painted the front door. It's the first thing people do when they buy." It was a small sign that said something big
5. You'll get a better home. In many parts of the country it can be really hard to find a good rental. All the best places are sold as condos. Money talks. Once again, this is a case by case issue: In Miami right now there are so many vacant luxury condos that owners will rent them out for a fraction of the cost of owning. But few places are so favored. Generally speaking, if you want the best home in the best neighborhood, you're better off buying.
6. It offers some inflation protection. No, it's not perfect. But studies by Professor Karl "Chip" Case (of Case-Shiller), and others, suggest that over the long-term housing has tended to beat inflation by a couple of percentage points a year. That's valuable inflation insurance, especially if you're young and raising a family and thinking about the next 30 or 40 years. In the recent past, inflation-protected government bonds, or TIPS, offered an easier form of inflation insurance. But yields there have plummeted of late. That also makes homeownership look a little better by contrast.
7. It's risk capital. No, your home isn't the stock market and you shouldn't view it as the way to get rich. But if the economy does surprise us all and start booming, sooner or later real estate prices will head up again, too. One lesson from the last few years is that stocks are incredibly hard for most normal people to own in large quantitiesfor practical as well as psychological reasons. Equity in a home is another way of linking part of your portfolio to the long-term growth of the economyif it happensand still managing to sleep at night.
8. It's forced savings. If you can rent an apartment for $2,000 month instead of buying one for $2,400 a month, renting may make sense. But will you save that $400 for your future? A lot of people won't. Most, I dare say. Once again, you have to do your math, but the part of your mortgage payment that goes to principal repayment isn't a cost. You're just paying yourself by building equity. As a forced monthly saving, it's a good discipline.
9. There is a lot to choose from. There is a glut of homes in most of the country. The National Association of Realtors puts the current inventory at around 4 million homes. That's below last year's peak, but well above typical levels, and enough for about a year's worth of sales. More keeping coming onto the market, too, as the banks slowly unload their inventory of unsold properties. That means great choice, as well as great prices.
10. Sooner or later, the market will clear. Demand and supply will meet. The population is forecast to grow by more than 100 million people over the next 40 years. That means maybe 40 million new households looking for homes. Meanwhile, this housing glut will work itself out. Many of the homes will be bought. But many more will simply be destroyedeither deliberately, or by inaction. This is already happening. Even two years ago, when I toured the housing slump in western Florida, I saw bankrupt condo developments that were fast becoming derelict. And, finally, a lot of the "glut" simply won't matter: It's concentrated in a few areas, like Florida and Nevada. Unless you live there, the glut won't have any long-term impact on housing supply in your town.
Want a loan modification? Get your paperwork ready.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Attention delinquent borrowers: If you want to get into the Obama administration's mortgage modification program, you'd better have your paperwork ready.
New Treasury Department guidelines go into effect on June 1 that will require loan servicers to verify applicants' income and financial hardship before placing them into trial modifications.
This will make it much tougher to get temporary relief from unaffordable mortgage payments. But if you make it into a trial modification, you're more likely to get long-term assistance, providing you send in your check on time.
"This will allow people to have more certainty that the modification they want will materialize," said Suzanne Boas, president of CredAbility, formerly the Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Atlanta.
Of the 1.2 million people who've started trial modifications, fewer than 300,000 have received permanent assistance. Another 278,000 have washed out of the program either because they didn't send in timely payments, hand in the required documents or meet the eligibility criteria.
Paperwork has caused all sorts of problems for the president's signature foreclosure rescue program. In order to get the effort off the ground quickly, administration officials allowed servicers to place people in trial modifications before verifying that they were indeed eligible for the program.
Originally intended to last three months, the trial period was meant to give troubled borrowers a chance to prove they could make the modified payments and qualify for a so-called permanent modification, which lasts five years.
Instead, many homeowners have been stuck in trial modifications for months and months while they wrestle with servicers over the documentation requirements. The financial institutions say that borrowers aren't sending in the needed forms; homeowners contend the servicers are losing them.
At Saxon Mortgage Services and JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), for instance, about three of four borrowers in the trial phase have lingered there for at least six months.
A few servicers, however, have been requiring documentation up front all along. And the impact of this practice is evident in the government's monthly modification report. Firms such as Ocwen Financial (OCN) and HomeEq Servicing have converted 83% of eligible borrowers to permanent modifications. Others that rely on stated income to place people in trials have yet to shift half their participants to long-term adjustments.
Many loans didn't require much documentation when they were originated, which makes gathering the paperwork during the modification process that much more difficult, said Paul Koches, executive vice president at Ocwen. But doing so helps servicers craft sustainable payment plans.
"It puts us in a better position to determine the specific terms and conditions of the modified loans that will make it more likely that they will stick," he said.
The pace of people entering trial modifications has already slowed as servicers have started requiring the paperwork in advance. Only 47,160 trials were started in April, down from more than 72,000 in February.
"You have pinging back and forth between borrowers and servicers," said David Sisko, who heads Deloitte & Touche's default management practice. "Requiring upfront documentation to really start the clock is a good thing."
Though the application process takes longer, borrowers understand that they will now have a better ideas of whether they'll get long-term assistance, said a Chase spokesperson.
Among the documents Chase and other servicers require are hardship affidavits, two recent pay stubs, a bank statement, a tax return, proof of occupancy and a 4506T-EZ form.
"If tey make the trial payments, it's almost certain they'll get a permanent modification because all the paperwork has been done upfront," she said.
More underwater homeowners to get cuts in principal balance
Lenders have resisted forgiving debt as part of mortgage modification programs, but the outlook for that step is changing.
March 28, 2010 - By Kenneth R. Harney
Reporting from Washington For hundreds of thousands of homeowners who are underwater on their mortgages, it's been a tantalizing question: Is there any way that our lender might agree to lower the amount we owe -- not just the monthly payments but the principal debt itself?
Until now, the answer almost always has been a resounding no. Lenders and investors were willing to cut interest rates, reschedule payments, even write off some late fees, but they were dead set against forgiving even a dollar of the principal balance.
The Obama administration's loan modification programs had sidestepped the subject as well, focusing on lowering troubled borrowers' monthly payments to more affordable levels rather than wiping out debt.
But the outlook for principal reductions is on the verge of change. Bank of America Corp. recently unveiled the mortgage industry's first large-scale principal forgiveness program, potentially involving up to 45,000 underwater borrowers and $3 billion in debt write-offs.
And on Friday, the Obama administration announced measures aimed at getting lenders to reduce underwater borrowers' principal balances and refinance their mortgages into government-sponsored loans. The changes could affect modifications offered by substantial numbers of banks and mortgage companies.
BofA's new program targets borrowers who are deeply underwater -- those with loan-to-value ratios of 120% or more. This means they owe at least 20% more on their mortgage balances than the current market worth of their homes. There is no upper limit on how far underwater borrowers can be, but the program has a 30% maximum reduction of any principal balance.
Barbara Desoer, president of BofA Home Loans, said the program attempted to address the problems of the most "severely underwater mortgages with some of the highest rates of delinquency," and could "become an industry model for principal reductions" on a far broader scale.
The program targets three mortgage products popular during the housing boom: subprime loans; payment-option mortgages with negative-amortization features; and "2-1" adjustables that offered teaser interest rates for the first two years, then converted into loans whose rates adjust once a year.
As part of its ongoing loan modification efforts, the bank will look to phased-in principal forgiveness as the first step toward keeping an underwater borrower out of foreclosure. Previously the bank looked first to lowering a homeowner's interest rate and monthly payments.
Here's how it will work, according to BofA officials: Say you're deeply underwater on a subprime mortgage that you took out from Countrywide Home Loans, which was acquired by BofA in 2008. Say your mortgage balance is $250,000, but your house is worth only $200,000.
If you're eligible, the new program could reduce your balance by $50,000 and your new payments would be based on the lowered principal debt and possibly a lower interest rate. This would be accomplished by the creation of an interest-free forbearance account covering a five-year period. Assuming you made regular payments at the lower amount during the first year, $10,000 would be forgiven by the bank.
The same would be true for the second and third years. By that point, $30,000 of your principal debt would have been extinguished. During the fourth and fifth years, the bank would appraise your property. If its value had appreciated in either year to the point where your loan-to-value ratio had dropped below 100% -- you were no longer underwater but still benefiting from the lowered payments -- there would be no forgiveness that year. If you remained underwater, you would receive the scheduled $10,000-per-year principal reductions, extinguishing the full $50,000 during a five-year span.
For certain payment-option loan borrowers who are underwater in part because of the negative amortization features of the mortgage, the bank will forgive the negative amortization amount down to a 95% loan-to-value level.
Without fanfare, Wells Fargo, the country's largest volume lender, also has moved to selectively offer principal reductions for certain underwater payment-option loans.
With the Obama administration supporting the concept, principal forgiveness might well become a lifeline for a much wider group of homeowners.
FORECLOSURE TIMELINE FOR OWNER-OCCUPIED REAL PROPERTY LOANS (made from 2003 to 2007) The approximate minimum time frames for the non-judicial foreclosure of owneroccupied real property loans made from 2003 to 2007 are as set forth below. In California, most lenders elect to foreclose non-judicially by conducting trustees' sales, not by judicial foreclosure. Pre-Foreclosure Period Day 1: Lender Contacts Borrower For owner-occupied loans from 2003 to 2007, a lender initiating the foreclosure process must generally contact the borrower by phone or in person to assess the borrowers financial situation and explore options for avoiding foreclosure. During the conversation, the lender must inform the borrower of the right to meet with the lender within 14 days. The lender must also give the borrower the toll-free number for finding a HUD-certified housing counseling agency. Day 31: Filing of Notice of Default For owner-occupied loans from 2003 to 2007, the lender may file a notice of default 30 days after contacting the borrower to explore options for avoiding foreclosure. The notice of default must be filed in the county where the property is located and a copy must be mailed within 10 business days after recordation to the borrower and all other persons who have requested such notice. The notice of default informs the borrower of the default. It must also include the lender's declaration that it has contacted the borrower to explore options for avoiding foreclosure, tried with due diligence to contact the borrower, or the borrower has surrendered the property. Day 121: Filing of Notice of Trustees Sale Three months after the filing of the notice of default, the lender may record a notice of trustees sale setting forth the date, time, and place of the upcoming trustees sale. Because of the gravity of a notice of trustees sale, it must be widely disseminated. The notice of trustees sale must be recorded, posted, mailed to the borrower and others, as well as published once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation. Day 145: Deadline to Cure Default Up to five business days before the trustees sale, the borrower may reinstate the loan by curing the default or paying the missed payments plus allowable costs. After the reinstatement period expires, the borrower still has the right to redeem the property by paying the entire debt, plus interest and costs (not just the arrearage), before the bidding begins at the trustees sale. Day 152: Trustees Sale Although California law allows a trustees sale to take place 20 days after the posting of the notice of trustees sale, lenders customarily wait at least 31 days instead to help protect against federal tax liens. At the trustees sale, the property is sold through a public auction to the highest bidder. Title is transferred to the successful bidder by trustees deed. USING THIS FORECLOSURE TIMELINE A foreclosure timeline helps you as a listing agent ascertain whether you have enough time to market and sell the property as a short sale. Depending on the stage of foreclosure the homeowner is in (Foreclosure Stage), the chart below gives you the total time frame you have, at a minimum, to sell a property as a short sale before the trustees sale occurs (Minimum Time Left to Sell).
As an example, if a notice of default has just been filed, you have a minimum of about four months to sell the property before the trustees sale may occur. Thats four months not only to find a buyer, but also to get the lender to approve the short sale and close escrow. The short sale lender may agree to postpone the trustees sale in some situations (such as when theres an accepted offer), but be sure to get any agreement for a postponement in writing. |
Foreclosure Consultants Beware!
According to DataQuick, there were more than 84,000 foreclosures in California in 2007, and that number is likely to more than double in 2008. The vast number of foreclosure has created new opportunitiesmany legitimate, others illegal.
It is unfortunate, but some unsavory types have seized the opportunity to take advantage of vulnerable homeowners facing foreclosure. At the heart of these foreclosure schemes is the collection of advance fees.
Unscrupulous operators comb the public records to obtain information on the properties against which a notice of default has been filed. These operators then contact the borrowers with promises of rescue in exchange for an advance fee. Often, the advance fee is collected by credit card and ranges from several hundred dollars to several thousand dollars. To induce the borrower to pay the fee, scammers tell the borrower they have the expertise and connections that ensure a loan modification can be negotiated with the borrowers lender to permanently reduce payments to sustainable levels. However, once the money is collected, no work is performed and the victim loses their home to foreclosure.
Housing Assistance Services in Garden Grove, California: Marc Shecklers company, Housing Assistance Services, Inc. (HAS), targeted homeowners in Orange County when they received notices of default. HAS mass marketed official-looking "Fresh Start Program" letters in the mail offering to provide counseling on the options for avoiding foreclosure and to negotiate loan modifications with the lenders. To sign up, a homeowner paid an upfront basic fee of $750 to $1,250 and agreed to pay additional fees for credit reports, "docusave" services, processing reinstatements, monitoring repayment plans, and financial education materials. HAS representatives instructed homeowners not to talk to their mortgage lenders. Whenever homeowners voiced concern about the impending foreclosure sale, HAS reassured the homeowners that things would be worked out. The California Attorney Generals Office received numerous complaints from consumers who paid the fees, but claimed that HAS never provided the services as promised. In 2004, California Attorney General Bill Lockyer filed a $2 million lawsuit against HAS and obtained a court order freezing HAS's assets.
Rodriguez in Downey, California: From 2003 to 2005, Martha Rodriguez and others ran a foreclosure rescue scam in Southern California. They located their victims using computerized lists of properties going into foreclosure. The defrauders promised to help homeowners refinance their loans and save their credit, but what they did in reality was arrange for straw buyers to buy the homes. By the time the defrauders were finally caught by the authorities, they had victimized over 100 homeowners and amassed over $12 million. Rodriguez ran this scam while awaiting sentencing on another loan fraud scheme. In February 2007, she pleaded guilty to criminal charges for the foreclosure rescue scam and faces a possible sentence of 40 years in federal prison.
Rice in Orange County, California: In 1990, Evelyn Onofrios home was in foreclosure when Marshall Rice paid her a house call. He offered to help her but did not give her a written foreclosure consultant contract. He arranged a secured loan for her, but at 35% interest payable to Rice's own wife. When Onofrio defaulted on the loan, Rice and his wife commenced foreclosure proceedings and acquired the property at the trustees sale. Onofrio sued Rice for, among other things, violating the foreclosure consultant law and breaching his fiduciary duties as a real estate broker. Rice violated the foreclosure consultant law by, among other things, acquiring an interest in the property and failing to provide a written foreclosure consultant contract. The court awarded Onofrio monetary damages, attorneys' fees, and costs, and cancelled not only the transfer of title to Rice, but the relevant deeds of trust as well. This case is Onofrio v. Rice (1997) 55 Cal .App. 4th 413.
Alburez and Silva in Alameda, California: Sonia Alburez and Verena Silva went by several names, such as Community Home Savers and California Home Saver Program. They used lists of homes in default from the county recorder's office to send out mailers to homeowners in foreclosure. They allegedly told homeowners that, for an upfront fee plus additional monthly payments, they could save their homes from foreclosure. In reality, Alburez and Silva merely transferred a fractional interest of a home to a sham corporation. The sham corporation would then file bankruptcy, but as soon as the foreclosing lender challenged the bankruptcy, the sham would be uncovered and the foreclosure would resume. Alburez and Silva were arrested in Alameda County in March 2008.
Hutchings in San Diego, California: William Hutchings and his cohorts ran a foreclosure rescue scam in San Diego for over two years, and duped hundreds of homeowners out of their homes and money. Targeting mostly non-English-speaking homeowners, Hutchings held seminars on how he could help homeowners stop foreclosures by transferring title to their homes to his company. He claimed he could file a governmental land grant on their behalf which would extinguish their mortgages in four years, at which time the homeowners could reacquire their homes from Hutchings free and clear. He bolstered his claims by using visual aids, such as antiquated maps and land surveys. In reality, the last legitimate use of a land grant was in 1848 when Mexico ceded property to the U.S. at the end of the Mexican-American War. Yet, someone who attended one of Hutchings seminars observed that, when the seminar concluded, the homeowners would flood to the back of the room to stand in line to sign up for the program by signing over their properties and paying up to $10,000 upfront. Hutchings and the others were arrested in May 2008 and face over 100 felony charges.
Standefor in Pasadena, California: Jeanetta Standefor of Accelerated Funding Group operated a fraudulent foreclosure reinstatement scheme for over two years. She convinced over 600 people to invest a total of $18 million by claiming the funds would be used to cure defaults for distressed properties and promising a return of 50 percent in one month. What Standefor was actually doing was operating a ponzi-like scheme using the money from new investors to pay previous investors. She also used $1.9 million of the funds for her own lavish wedding, cars, jewelry, and other personal expenses. In 2008, Standefor was charged with both civil and criminal fraud and securities violations, and faces a statutory maximum sentence of 180 years in federal prison.
Davis of Tiburon, California: Mark Allen Davis placed over 100 newspaper ads around the country from 2004 to 2007 offering callers a list of government foreclosures in their areas for a one-time fee of $83 to $93. Customers were told to call a toll-free phone number, and then instructed to leave their names and bank account information for verification purposes. Davis never sent the lists. Instead, he withdrew $126 to $185 from the accounts of 800 people, totaling over $400,000. When caught, Davis was fined over $328,000 and sentenced to 81 months in federal prison for identity theft, mail fraud, and wire fraud.
Shell Company Preys on Desperate Homeowners!
Keep an eye out for a new "foreclosure assistance" scheme that has surfaced in the region!
Some homeowners have been contacted by a company called United First, Inc. that claims to offer a deal to prevent their homes from going into foreclosure. We have received confirmation from the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office that this is a scam.
According to the contract with United First, the homeowner pays an initial fee and then a monthly fee to the company, and adds United First to the homeowner's insurance policy.
The homeowner is required to retain Sherman Oaks attorney Mitchell Roth as legal counsel to file a "missing title" lawsuit, based on the claim that the foreclosing bank doesn't really own title to the home. In the unlikely events that the bank cut a deal with the homeowner or somehow the lawsuit won outright, United First would keep half or 80 percent of the profit. There are NO guarantees that this process will work.
United First is a shell company recently registered in Nevada. Its president, secretary, treasurer and director, Paul H. Noe, was convicted in 2003 of five felony counts of aiding and abetting wire fraud among other charges.
An SCCAOR member brought this issue to the attention of the Professional Standards Department, which then contacted the DA's Office.
SCCAOR stays vigilant on protecting the rights of consumers and we urge you to spread the word about this scheme among your colleagues and clients.
For information on Paul H. Noe's past conviction:
Click Here
For an article at sfweekly.com on the United First scam:
Click Here
LOAN MODIFICATION
A loan modification is a permanent change in one or more of the terms of a borrowers loan which if made, allows the loan to be reinstated, and results in a payment the borrower can afford. Modifications may include a change in the interest rate; capitalization of delinquent principal, interest or escrow items; extension of the time available to repay the loan; and/or re-amortization of the balance due.
Modification may be appropriate for borrowers who have experienced a permanent or long term reduction in income or increase in expenses, or have recovered from the cause of the default but do not have sufficient surplus income to repay the arrearage through a repayment plan. To qualify, borrowers must be able to support the monthly mortgage debt after the terms of the loan are modified.
Not all loans are appropriate for modification. Loan characteristics which best support modification include: loans with above market interest rates; lower loan to value ratios; and/or mature terms (loans paid down 10 years or more). The modification tool is valuable when the arrearage can be capitalized into the loan balance, the term extended and/or the interest rate adjusted to current market rate, so that the resulting monthly payment is at a level the borrower can afford.
Modification is most often used to reduce a borrowers payment when the cause of the default is permanent or long term. However, if a borrower has recovered from a short term financial problem and has strong income, a modification may be used to increase the monthly payment slightly, allowing the borrower to repay the arrearage gradually over the life of the loan.
Approximately 96% of all FHA insured loans are securitized in Ginnie Mae guaranteed pools. Prior to modification, but no sooner than the 90th day of default, securitized loans must be purchased from pools. Ginnie Mae has recently streamlined its re-pooling requirements allowing almost all modified FHA loans to be quickly repooled. Details of Ginnie Maes modification policy are found in the All Participants Letter 96-15, Pooling FHA Loans That Have Been Modified as a Result of Loss Mitigation Efforts.
FHA has recently made several changes to its modification program. First, the Department realized that borrowers with below market interest rates were being excluded from the modification program because their loans had to be re-pooled at a discount. When appropriate, lenders may now increase the note interest, not to exceed market rate as defined below in Section F, page 21. Next, to protect borrowers from future payment increases, all modifications must now result in a fully amortizing, fixed rate loan. Adjustable and other variable payment loans will be converted to fixed as a condition of the modification. Finally, the BPO requirement has been eliminated (there is no longer a BPO requirement for any of the reinstatement options). These changes are more fully described below.
A. Loan Delinquency
To modify a defaulted mortgage under the loss mitigation program:
Three or more full monthly payments must be due and unpaid.
At least 12 months have elapsed since the origination date of the loan.
The loan may not be in foreclosure at the time the modification is executed, however, loans removed from foreclosure status may be modified.
The default must be due to a verifiable loss of income or increase in living expenses.
Note: Loans which are not delinquent but are in danger of imminent default may be modified at the discretion of the lender and insurance coverage will be increased above the original certificate amount as necessary. However, performing loan modifications do not qualify for incentives under the Loss Mitigation Program, and may not meet Ginne Mae requirements for re-pooling of modified loans, which requirements are described in Ginne Maes All Participants Letter, 96-15.
B. Borrower Qualifications
Modifications may be offered to borrowers who have stabilized, surplus income which, while not sufficient to sustain the original loan and repay the arrearage, is sufficient to support the monthly payment under the modified rate and/or term.
The borrower must be an owner occupant, committed to occupying the property as a primary residence. Modification may not be used as a means to reinstate a loan prior to a sale or assumption.
C. Property Condition
While the modification option does not include a loan-to-value restriction, and no appraisal or brokers price opinion is required, the lender must conduct any review it deems necessary to verify that the property has no physical conditions which adversely impact the borrowers continued use or ability to support the debt.
A borrower may not be able to support payments under a modification if the property is in such a deteriorated condition that repairs drain the borrowers monthly resources. An analysis of the borrowers surplus income should consider anticipated property maintenance expenses. If the mortgagees inspection identifies a property in extremely poor physical condition, a modification may not offer a permanent resolution to the default.
Costs to complete needed repairs may not be capitalized as part of a modification agreement, nor may a borrower receive any cash back from a modification. Borrowers who have sufficient equity and income to receive cash back should be considered for a delinquent refinance.
D. Financial Analysis
The lender is required to assess the borrowers financial condition as described in Section H, page 10. HUD expects the lender to project the borrowers surplus monthly income for a minimum of three months, and use good business judgment to determine if the borrower has the capacity to repay the arrearage through a repayment or special forbearance plan, before considering modification. If the financial analysis determines that the borrower does not have the ability to support the modified monthly payment, the modification option may not be used.
E. Combining Options
Modification may be utilized as a stand alone tool, or incorporated as part of a repayment, or special forbearance agreement. For example, if a borrower needs time to resolve the default, but will eventually be able to support the debt at the modified rate but no more than that, a repayment plan or special forbearance may culminate in a loan modification. An existing repayment plan, or special forbearance may also be converted to modification if the borrowers circumstances change.
Mortgage modification may not be used in conjunction with a partial claim. If modification is appropriate, it should be used as the primary tool to bring the account current.
F. Allowable Provisions
The following provisions apply to loan modifications:
All modifications must result in a fixed rate loan. ARM, GPM and GEM mortgages may only be modified to fixed payment, fully amortizing loans.
The modification must fully reinstate the loan.
At the lenders discretion, note interest rates may be reduced below market if necessary to resolve the default. Discount fees associated with rate reductions are not reimbursable.
At the lenders discretion, note interest rates may be increased if supported by the borrowers ability to pay. The maximum interest allowable shall be calculated as 150 basis points above the current FHA debenture interest rate. Debenture interest rates are provided semi-annually through mortgagee letter.
All or a portion of the PITI arrearage (principal, interest, and escrow items) may be capitalized to the mortgage balance.
Foreclosure costs, late fees and other administrative expenses may not be capitalized. Lenders may collect the legal and administrative fees (resulting from the canceled foreclosure action), from mortgagors to the extent not reimbursed by HUD, either through a lump sum payment or through a repayment plan separate from, and subordinate to, the modification agreement.
The modified principal balance may exceed the principal balance at origination.
The modified principal balance may exceed 100% loan-to-value.
Lenders may re-amortize the total unpaid amount due over the remaining term of the mortgage, or may extend the term not more than 10 years beyond the original maturity date or 360 months from the due date of the first installment required under the modified mortgage, whichever is less.
G. Lien Status
The lender must ensure first-lien status of the modified mortgage. In satisfying this requirement, the lender must comply with any applicable state or federal laws and regulations.
If title to the property is encumbered with an FHA Title I loan, and the lender servicing the Title II loan has determined that a subordination agreement is necessary, the lender may send a written subordination request to:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Home Improvement Branch
451 7th Street, SW, Room 9272
Washington, DC 20410
If title to the property is encumbered with an FHA Title I loan which has been assigned to the Secretary, and the lender servicing the Title II loan has determined that a subordination agreement is necessary, the lender servicing the Title II loan may send a written subordination request to:
HUD Albany Financial Operations Center
Asset Recovery Division
52 Corporate Circle
Albany, NY 12203
(518) 464-4200
H. Required Documentation
FHA does not dictate a specific format for documentation of the modification agreement. The lender is responsible for ensuring that the modification documentation preserves the first lien status of the FHA insured loan. The lender will have to make the determination in accordance with state law as to whether it is necessary to record the Modification Agreement to maintain the first lien requirement.
I. Disclosures
FHA requires lenders to comply with any disclosure or notice requirements applicable under State or Federal law.
J. FHA Mortgage Insurance
Where the loan modification has been processed in accordance with all HUD requirements, the FHA mortgage insurance coverage will be extended to the new principal balance of the loan following modification of eligible loans. Modification has no effect on the one-time MIP or on periodic MIP payments. Monthly MIP payments must be calculated on the original insurance amount.
K. Lender Incentives
FHA will pay lenders a $500 incentive fee for each modification and will reimburse the actual cost of the title search and/or endorsement to the title policy not to exceed $250.00. No other expenses may be included on the claim.
L. Failure
In the event the borrower becomes delinquent following modification, it shall be treated as a new default and serviced accordingly. In the event the loan is foreclosed following modification, the lender must be prepared to deliver a copy of the modification agreement to the Department when a conveyance claim is filed. The lender shall be responsible for maintaining the first lien status of the insured loan subsequent to modification. Any amount of a loan which is not in the first priority position will be considered uninsured and not subject to claim. HUD reserves the right at the time of claim submission to request documentation (legal or otherwise) establishing the first lien status.
M. Limitations on Use
If a loan has been modified or reinstated using a partial claim within the past three years, re-default risk is presumed to increase following a subsequent modification. Prior to granting a modification in this circumstance, the lender must prepare a written justification, and retain a copy along with supporting documents in the claim review file. It is anticipated that this will be a highly unusual occurrence, and that the cause of the second default will be unrelated to the original problem.
N. Filing For Incentive Payment
The lender must file the claim for incentive payment within 60 days of the execution date of the modification agreement. It is not necessary to send a copy of the modification agreement, however, it must be retained in the claim review file and made available to FHA upon request.
FHA will pay lenders a $500 incentive fee for each modification and will reimburse the actual cost of the title search and/or endorsement to the title policy not to exceed $250.00. No other expenses may be included on the claim.
CALIFORNIAFORECLOSURE ACTIVITY INCREASES; DEFAULT NOTICES DECLINE
Californialed the nation with 72,285 foreclosure filings in July, a 5 percent increase from June and an 85 percent increase from July 2007, according to a recent report by RealtyTrac. Bank repossessions, auction notices, and default notices all increased in year-over-year comparisons. Default notices however, which are the first phase in foreclosure proceedings, declined 4 percent from June, according to the report.
CALIFORNIAENACTS FORECLOSURE REFORM LAW TO PROTECT HOMEOWNERS FACING DEFAULTS
FORECLOSURE RELIEF BILL BECOMES LAW
Brought to you by the California Association of REALTORS
This week, the State Legislature enacted foreclosure reform law to address the adverse effects of high foreclosure rates in
California
. The new law requires lenders to contact homeowners to explore optionsfor avoiding foreclosure at least 30 days before filing a notice of default. It also requires owners acquiring property through foreclosure to maintain the exterior of vacant residential properties. The new law also extends from 30 to 60 days the time for residential tenants to move out of properties that have been foreclosed upon, unless other laws apply. These requirements will remain in effect until January 1, 2013. The full text of Senate Bill 1137 (Perata) is available atwww.leginfo.ca.gov.
Highlights of the new law are as follows:
NEW HOME SALES IN CALIFORNIA DECLINE 51 PERCENT IN MAY
Sales of new homes in California declined 51 percent in May compared with the same month in 2007, according to new data from the California Building Industry Association (CBIA)
Slumping sales in May point to need for Congress to quickly pass stimulus bill
SACRAMENTO The pace of home sales at California new-home communities was significantly depressed in May, reversing what had been a recent trend of shrinking year-over-year sales declines and prompting the California Building Industry Association to urge Congress to quickly pass pending legislation to stimulate the beleaguered housing market.
The monthly CBIA/Hanley Wood Market Intelligence (HWMI) New Home Sales and Pricing Report showed that new home sales in May were 51 percent below May 2007. The drop represents a worsening in the trend of year-over-year decline, which had shrunk to 44 percent in April after coming in at 49 percent in March.
Robert Rivinius, CBIAs President and CEO, said the deteriorating housing climate demands quick Congressional action.
Congress is now debating HR 3221, a major housing stimulus bill that would help ease the foreclosure problem, help stabilize the two federally chartered firms that guarantee most of the nations mortgage loans, provide a tax credit to stimulate home sales, and help reduce mortgage rates in high cost states like California, Rivinius said.
There is bipartisan consensus that these provisions are needed, but there are major differences between the versions of the bill passed by the House and the Senate.
California
homebuilders urge Congress to quickly work out their differences and send this bill to the Presidents desk.
During May, 3,064 homes and condominiums were sold in the subdivisions tracked by Costa Mesa-based HWMI, compared to 6,310 in May 2007, and down more than 66 percent from the 9,053 sales reported in May 2006. During May, sales of single-family homes dropped by 44 percent, while sales of townhomes and plexes duplexes, triplexes, etc. were down 45 percent, and sales of condominiums were down by nearly 74 percent.
Non-seasonally adjusted total new-home sales in May were 5.6 percent lower than levels seen in April, whereas the same month-to-month change a year ago was up by 9 percent. The median price of homes sold compared to last month was nearly unchanged at $375,000.
Jonathan Dienhart, Director of Published Research for HWMI, said the faltering market is likely to face some additional hardship prior to recovery.
What had appeared to be a slow trend of stabilization in new-home sales activity seems to have fallen apart, Dienhart said. With sales continuing to slump, its going to make the rest of 2008 a rocky ride for homebuilders.
He also suggested that foreclosure and bank-owned sales in the existing home market could be partially to blame.
Bargain hunters are the ones out in the market today, and foreclosure/bank-owned property sales are often where the most substantial discounts can be found. Until we move through more of that inventory, the new-home market will face stiff competition from these below-market-rate offerings.
After weeks of internal wrangling, the U.S. Senate last week passed HR 3221, known as the Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008. Senators added several amendments to an earlier version of the bill passed by the House, which Rivinius said could mean the bill will need even more time before it gets final approval from both houses of Congress. The bill as now written would increase the federal conforming loan limits from $417,000 to $625,000, a long-overdue reform that would let many more buyers take advantage of so-called conforming loan mortgage rates which are significantly less than the larger jumbo loans many
California
buyers must obtain because of the higher costs of housing in most parts of the state.
CBIA is urging lawmakers to make permanent the even-higher loan limit of up to $729,750, which Congress enacted for this year only earlier this year when it passed its first housing stimulus bill.
###
The California Building Industry Association is a statewide trade association representing thousands of homebuilders, remodelers, subcontractors, architects, engineers, designers, and other industry professionals. More information is available on the Association's Web site, www.cbia.org.
Hanley Wood Market Intelligence is the housing industrys leading provider of rich data and consulting services on residential real estate development and new-home construction and is a division of Hanley Wood, LLC, the premier media company serving housing and construction. More information is available on the companys Web site, www.hanleywood.com/hwmior by calling 1-800-639-3777.
Hanley Wood Market Intelligence (HWMI) collects data from new for-sale production subdivisions of 10 units or more on a monthly basis. HWMI Net Sales represent sales contracts signed during the period indicated minus any reported cancellations. Median and Average Prices are based upon the minimum asking price of the plans sold during the period and do not include the cost of any lot/view premiums or upgrades. Because this data is collected monthly and based upon sales contracts that represent future closings, HWMI data is the most forward-looking data source available for new home information in the state of California.
Release Date: July 14, 2008
For immediate release
The Federal Reserve Board on Monday approved a final rule for home mortgage loans to better protect consumers and facilitate responsible lending. The rule prohibits unfair, abusive or deceptive home mortgage lending practices and restricts certain other mortgage practices. The final rule also establishes advertising standards and requires certain mortgage disclosures to be given to consumers earlier in the transaction.
The final rule, which amends Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) and was adopted under the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), largely follows a proposal released by the Board in December 2007, with enhancements that address ensuing public comments, consumer testing, and further analysis.
"The proposed final rules are intended to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive acts and practices in mortgage lending, while keeping credit available to qualified borrowers and supporting sustainable homeownership," said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke. "Importantly, the new rules will apply to all mortgage lenders, not just those supervised and examined by the Federal Reserve. Besides offering broader protection for consumers, a uniform set of rules will level the playing field for lenders and increase competition in the mortgage market, to the ultimate benefit of borrowers," the Chairman said.
The final rule adds four key protections for a newly defined category of "higher-priced mortgage loans" secured by a consumer's principal dwelling. For loans in this category, these protections will:
Prohibit a lender from making a loan without regard to borrowers' ability to repay the loan from income and assets other than the home's value. A lender complies, in part, by assessing repayment ability based on the highest scheduled payment in the first seven years of the loan. To show that a lender violated this prohibition, a borrower does not need to demonstrate that it is part of a "pattern or practice."
Require creditors to verify the income and assets they rely upon to determine repayment ability.
Ban any prepayment penalty if the payment can change in the initial four years. For other higher-priced loans, a prepayment penalty period cannot last for more than two years. This rule is substantially more restrictive than originally proposed.
Require creditors to establish escrow accounts for property taxes and homeowner's insurance for all first-lien mortgage loans.
"These changes have made for better rules that will go far in protecting consumers from unfair practices and restoring confidence in our mortgage system," said Governor Randall S. Kroszner.
In addition to the rules governing higher-priced loans, the rules adopt the following protections for loans secured by a consumer's principal dwelling, regardless of whether the loan is higher-priced:
Creditors and mortgage brokers are prohibited from coercing a real estate appraiser to misstate a home's value.
Companies that service mortgage loans are prohibited from engaging in certain practices, such as pyramiding late fees. In addition, servicers are required to credit consumers' loan payments as of the date of receipt and provide a payoff statement within a reasonable time of request.
Creditors must provide a good faith estimate of the loan costs, including a schedule of payments, within three days after a consumer applies for any mortgage loan secured by a consumer's principal dwelling, such as a home improvement loan or a loan to refinance an existing loan. Currently, early cost estimates are only required for home-purchase loans. Consumers cannot be charged any fee until after they receive the early disclosures, except a reasonable fee for obtaining the consumer's credit history.
For all mortgages, the rule also sets additional advertising standards. Advertising rules now require additional information about rates, monthly payments, and other loan features. The final rule bans seven deceptive or misleading advertising practices, including representing that a rate or payment is "fixed" when it can change.
The rule's definition of "higher-priced mortgage loans" will capture virtually all loans in the subprime market, but generally exclude loans in the prime market. To provide an index, the Federal Reserve Board will publish the "average prime offer rate," based on a survey currently published by Freddie Mac. A loan is higher-priced if it is a first-lien mortgage and has an annual percentage rate that is 1.5 percentage points or more above this index, or 3.5 percentage points if it is a subordinate-lien mortgage. This definition overcomes certain technical problems with the original proposal, but the expected market coverage is similar.
One element of the original proposal has been withdrawn. The Federal Reserve Board had proposed for public comment certain requirements pertaining to so-called "yield-spread premiums." During the intervening period, the Board engaged in consumer testing that cast significant doubt on the effectiveness of the proposed rule. As part of its ongoing review of closed-end loan rules under Regulation Z, however, the Board will consider alternative approaches.
In finalizing the rule, the Board carefully considered information obtained from testimony, public hearings, consumer testing, and over 4,500 comment letters submitted during the comment period. "Listening carefully to the commenters, collecting and analyzing data, and undertaking consumer testing, has led to more effective and improved final rules," Governor Kroszner said.
The new rules take effect on October 1, 2009. The single exception is the escrow requirement, which will be phased in during 2010 to allow lenders to establish new systems as needed.
In a related move, the Board is publishing for public comment a proposal to revise the definition of "higher-priced mortgage loan" under Regulation C (Home Mortgage Disclosure), which requires lenders to report price information for such loans, to conform to the definition the Board is adopting under Regulation Z.
Foreclosures Rose 53% in June, Bank Seizures Tripled
By Dan Levy
July 10 (Bloomberg)
U.S.
foreclosure filings increased 53 percent in June from a year earlier and bank seizures rose the most on record as deteriorating property values and higher rates on adjustable mortgages forced more people to give up their homes. More than 252,000 properties, or one in 501
U.S.
households, entered a stage of the foreclosure process, RealtyTrac Inc., a seller of default data, said today in a statement. Bank seizures rose 171 percent, the most since the Irvine, California-based company began tracking statistics on default notices, warnings of a scheduled auction and repossessions in January 2005.
``The foreclosure problem is getting worse and will stay with us well into the next decade,'' Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com in West Chester, Pennsylvania , said in an interview. ``The job market is eroding and homeowners have less equity. Lenders are much less willing to work with you if you've got negative equity, and you're more likely to give up your house if you're deeply underwater.''
Foreclosure activity is the highest since the Great Depression of the 1930s, said Rick Sharga, RealtyTrac's vice president of marketing. Home prices, which fell the most on record in April, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller index of 20
U.S.
metropolitan areas, have created a cycle where shrinking equity drives homeowners into foreclosure, which in turn further pushes down home prices, Sharga said. 1 Million Homes
``We'll have 1 million bank-owned properties by the end of the year,'' Sharga said in an interview. ``That will represent between one-fourth and one-third of all home sales.''
About 53 percent of borrowers with subprime loans, those with poor or incomplete credit histories, will have negative equity in their homes at the end of the year, and the number will rise to 63 percent in 2009, New York-based analysts at Credit Suisse led by Rod Dubitsky said in an April 23 report.
Tighter underwriting standards mean borrowers whose adjustable-rate mortgages reset to higher payments can't refinance their loans, Credit Suisse said. About 2.7 million subprime borrowers will enter the foreclosure process by the end of 2012, with a peak of new foreclosures in the third quarter this year, the analysts said.
About $3.5 trillion in homeowner equity has been wiped out since the spring of 2006, when housing prices were at their peak, Zandi said.
Glut
Rising mortgage defaults and auctions of foreclosed properties are adding to a glut of unsold homes and prolonging the housing slump. Efforts by the U.S. Congress to insure as much as $300 billion in refinanced mortgages and save up to 2 million borrowers from foreclosure can work only by ``slowing down or reversing home price declines and equity deterioration,'' Credit Suisse said.
Home prices will ``absolutely'' decline another 5 to 10 percent and could fall further if the slowing U.S. economy enters a deep recession, Susan Wachter, a professor of real estate finance at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, said today on Bloomberg Radio.
While foreclosure rates are worst in parts of
California , Nevada and Florida , where lax lending standards put subprime borrowers at risk of defaulting, and Ohio and Michigan
in the U.S. Midwest , where the auto industry cut jobs, other parts of the country remain stable, Wachter said.
``We are in a serious regional recession, but there are many markets where housing prices are not falling,'' she said. Nationwide, Filings fell 3 percent from May. ``May was the highest month we've ever recorded, so a little bit of a drop off was inevitable,'' Sharga said.
Nevada , California
Nevada had the highest foreclosure rate for the 18th consecutive month. One in every 122 households was in some stage of foreclosure, more than four times the national average, and 3,133 properties in the state were seized by lenders, said RealtyTrac. The company has a database of more than 1.5 million properties and monitors foreclosure filings including default notices, auction notices and bank seizures.
California ranked second, with one filing for every 192 households, 2.6 times the national average, and had 20,624 properties seized by banks.
Arizona
ranked third at one in 201 households, almost 2.5 times the national average, and had 4,297 bank seizures.
Florida, Michigan , Ohio , Colorado , Georgia , Indiana and Utah
also ranked among the 10 states with the highest foreclosure rates. `Beyond the Sprawl'
California
had seven of the 10
U.S.
metro areas with the highest rates, including the top three. Stockton, in the state's central valley, was first with one in every 72 households in a stage of foreclosure, followed by Merced, about 110 miles east of San Francisco, with one in 77 households, and Modesto, near the Sierra Nevada mountains, with one in 86 households. Riverside-San Bernardino ranked fifth, Vallejo-Fairfield was seventh,
Bakersfield
was eighth and Salinas-Monterey was tenth. ``The housing beyond the sprawl is going to suffer another serious leg down because of high oil prices,'' Peter Navarro, professor of economics and public policy at the University of California at Irvine, said in an interview. ``A lot of people went out there to get cheaper homes, but this is going to take a big bite out of their mortgage.''
Cape Coral-Fort Myers and Fort Lauderdale , Florida , ranked fourth and ninth, respectively, and Las Vegas
was sixth among metro areas with the 10 highest foreclosure rates.
California
had the most total filings for the 18th consecutive month, increasing 77 percent in June from a year earlier to 68,666.
Florida
was second at 40,351 filings, an increase of 92 percent, and
Ohio
was third at 13,194, an increase of 11 percent.
New York
filings increased 22 percent from a year earlier to 5,367, with one in every 1,473 households in a stage of foreclosure, the 32nd highest rate.
New Jersey
filings rose 5 percent. The state had one in every 695 households in a stage of foreclosure, the 14th highest rate.
Many professionals charge a four-hour minimum, for example, or a service charge, to make minor tasks worth their time. Homeowners can save money on repairs and remodeling by saving up odd jobs, such as replacing a faucet or installing a ceiling fan, and hiring someone to do them all at once.
World's easiest quiz
Passing requires 4 correct answers
1) How long did the Hundred Years' War last?
2) Which country makes
Panama
hats?
3) From which animal do we get cat gut?
4) In which month do Russians celebrate the October Revolution?
5) What is a camel's hair brush made of?
6) The
Canary Islands
in the Pacific are named after what animal?
7) What was King George VI's first name?
8) What color is a purple finch?
9) Where are Chinese gooseberries from?
10) What is the color of the black box in a commercial airplane?
Remember, you need 4 correct answers to pass.
Check your answers below.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>SCROLL DOWN
>
>
>
>
>
>
ANSWERS TO THE QUIZ
1) How long did the Hundred Years War last? 116 years
2) which country makes
Panama
hats?
Ecuador
3) From which animal do we get cat gut? Sheep and Horses
4) in which month do
Russia celebrate the October Revolution? November
5) what is a camel's hair brush made of? Squirrel fur
6) The
Canary Islands in the Pacific are named after what animal? Dogs
7) What was King George VI's first name? Albert
8) What color is a purple finch? Crimson
9) Where are Chinese gooseberries from?
New Zealand
10) what is the color of the black box in a commercial airplane? Orange (of course)
what do you mean, you failed? Me, too.
Copyright 2010 Home Net 123. All rights reserved.
Home Net 123
Campbell, CA 95008
United States
ph: 408-275-1798
fax: 408-871-8301
home